Posted by: zvykov
« on: August 04, 2023, 06:53:01 pm »Everything works in the new version, thanks 
News:
Thank you for using this forum as the technical support base for your device.
● You can format the text and attach screenshots, photos and RDS Spy records
● Faster reply: 50 % of questions are answered within 30 minutes
● You don't need to register (but registration is possible)
● The members represent a wide range of experts
● The resolution will be helpful to other users
● You'll be notified by email about new post
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 14, 2023, 01:16:06 pm »Okay, I will be waiting.
Posted by: Jan
« on: June 14, 2023, 12:15:38 pm »Updates are usually released in 1 to 2 months periods.
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 14, 2023, 12:04:58 pm »Thank you for your responsiveness.
Is there an estimated release date?
Is there an estimated release date?
Posted by: Jan
« on: June 14, 2023, 11:59:52 am »I'll add the field edit into the nearest update.
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 14, 2023, 11:43:35 am »Thanks, I just really want to work normally with this encoder from magicrds 
I suppose there is a chance to see this tweak in future releases?
Encoder model fora600k.
I suppose there is a chance to see this tweak in future releases?
Encoder model fora600k.
Posted by: Jan
« on: June 14, 2023, 11:09:09 am »You made a great analysis
So the coder does not meet the UECP specs at this point:
5th byte:
Bits 4..1: 0 Indefinite transmissions
Instead of infinite loop of such RT, the RT is never transmitted. Very treasonable, making the coder almost useless in many cases. On the other hand, it must be mentioned that the UECP document is not written well in some aspects.
The Magic RDS 4 needs to be updated because this field is currently not user configurable. Please let us know the coder model and manufacturer, as this may be useful to know for other users.
So the coder does not meet the UECP specs at this point:
5th byte:
Bits 4..1: 0 Indefinite transmissions
Instead of infinite loop of such RT, the RT is never transmitted. Very treasonable, making the coder almost useless in many cases. On the other hand, it must be mentioned that the UECP document is not written well in some aspects.
The Magic RDS 4 needs to be updated because this field is currently not user configurable. Please let us know the coder model and manufacturer, as this may be useful to know for other users.
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 14, 2023, 09:38:45 am »The encoder has the ability to read what is loaded into it.
Here is from the original app:
RT[01](64) Clr, 2, Tgl, 'Egor Kann - Se lya Vi ' 0A0101410545676F72204B616E6E202D205365206C7961205669202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020
here is from magicrds:
RT[01](64) Clr, 0, Tgl, 'Egor Kann - Se Lya Vi ' 0A0101410145676F72204B616E6E202D205365204C79612056692020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020
Conducted an experiment, the problem is in the marked.
Here is from the original app:
RT[01](64) Clr, 2, Tgl, 'Egor Kann - Se lya Vi ' 0A0101410545676F72204B616E6E202D205365206C7961205669202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020
here is from magicrds:
RT[01](64) Clr, 0, Tgl, 'Egor Kann - Se Lya Vi ' 0A0101410145676F72204B616E6E202D205365204C79612056692020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020
Conducted an experiment, the problem is in the marked.
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 14, 2023, 09:09:21 am »Hi Jan. Tried your method, no change. The encoder behavior remains the same: normally accepts the first command, then stops. From the original, too, no longer accepts after that. Reset helps, and after that another message pops up from magicrds, which was not shown, but, apparently, got into the encoder memory. It works fine with the native app, but it's terribly inconvenient.
Posted by: Jan
« on: June 13, 2023, 09:09:13 pm »[FE 00 00 09 45 0A 01 00 41 05 44 4A 20 53 4D 41 53 48 20 26 20 4E 49 56 45 53 54 41 20 2D 20 50 6F 7A 76 6F 6E 69 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 3B 1D FF]
Site address (0), Encoder address (0)
MEC 0A - RT: DSN (1); PSN (0); MEL (65); '00000101' "DJ SMASH & NIVESTA - Pozvoni "
I do not see anything non-standard, except the DSN field which they send with a value of 1, usually the value is 0 (current data set), effectively covering any data set. Maybe the coder does not understand the value of 0? You can specify the value of 1 in the External text tool for that coder:
sendto "Connection xxx" dsn:1
Site address (0), Encoder address (0)
MEC 0A - RT: DSN (1); PSN (0); MEL (65); '00000101' "DJ SMASH & NIVESTA - Pozvoni "
I do not see anything non-standard, except the DSN field which they send with a value of 1, usually the value is 0 (current data set), effectively covering any data set. Maybe the coder does not understand the value of 0? You can specify the value of 1 in the External text tool for that coder:
sendto "Connection xxx" dsn:1
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 13, 2023, 10:20:36 am »I tried to add various initial commands, but also did not achieve a result, any ideas? I really want to set up this system.
Posted by: zvykov
« on: June 02, 2023, 03:55:48 pm »Hi Jan, I've been using your app for a long time, it's good and flexible. But i ran into a coder who understands uecp commands very badly.
UECP support is declared by the manufacturer and the original encoder control program also sends via uecp, but the syntax is slightly different. I give a log from the original application. Is it possible to connect them somehow?
log:
-> "0A01004105444A20534D4153482026204E495645535441202D20506F7A766F6E69202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020"
-> /RT (01,00) # 05 "Clear,2,Tgl" 'DJ SMASH & NIVESTA - Pozvoni ' ;
-> Port: COM1(19200, NO, 1000)
-> 0000 09 45 0A01004105444A20534D4153482026204E495645535441202D20506F7A766F6E69202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020 3B1D
-> FE000009450A01004105444A20534D4153482026204E495645535441202D20506F7A766F6E692020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020203B1DFF
UECP support is declared by the manufacturer and the original encoder control program also sends via uecp, but the syntax is slightly different. I give a log from the original application. Is it possible to connect them somehow?
log:
-> "0A01004105444A20534D4153482026204E495645535441202D20506F7A766F6E69202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020"
-> /RT (01,00) # 05 "Clear,2,Tgl" 'DJ SMASH & NIVESTA - Pozvoni ' ;
-> Port: COM1(19200, NO, 1000)
-> 0000 09 45 0A01004105444A20534D4153482026204E495645535441202D20506F7A766F6E69202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020 3B1D
-> FE000009450A01004105444A20534D4153482026204E495645535441202D20506F7A766F6E692020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020203B1DFF