Posted by: Jan
« on: October 13, 2011, 04:48:54 pm »I understand what you mean, unfortunately a real solution is not known to me for this situation.
The transmitter should be good enough to affect the phase and amplitude of MPX compoments minimally. Compensation on the stereo encoder does not give real solution as you can effectively compensate the separation loss only at one frequency, say 1 kHz, but not in whole audio band. Better solution seems to be ensuring amplitude flatness of the FM modulator in whole MPX range 30 Hz to 60 kHz, especially in critical range 10 kHz to 60 kHz as at lower frequencies the flatness is usually good in all cases. This can be measured at selected modulation frequencies using carrier null effect with a precision of about 0.05 dB, i.e. comparing modulation sine signal level and FM deviation caused by this signal.
However the MPX flatness of any analogue FM transmitter will never be 100%. This is one of the reasons why real high separation (not only paper-like) is achievable more likely using DDS modulator and fully digital stereo encoder.
The transmitter should be good enough to affect the phase and amplitude of MPX compoments minimally. Compensation on the stereo encoder does not give real solution as you can effectively compensate the separation loss only at one frequency, say 1 kHz, but not in whole audio band. Better solution seems to be ensuring amplitude flatness of the FM modulator in whole MPX range 30 Hz to 60 kHz, especially in critical range 10 kHz to 60 kHz as at lower frequencies the flatness is usually good in all cases. This can be measured at selected modulation frequencies using carrier null effect with a precision of about 0.05 dB, i.e. comparing modulation sine signal level and FM deviation caused by this signal.
However the MPX flatness of any analogue FM transmitter will never be 100%. This is one of the reasons why real high separation (not only paper-like) is achievable more likely using DDS modulator and fully digital stereo encoder.